Sunday, February 27, 2011

Automatic Wish Post Facebook

Rolando No. 18

















And our story continues ...

Denise Milani What Happened To?

my predictions

well, here are all my predictions ... next, in case anyone interested, I add what I would have liked to win in If no match ... i only the major categories (or rather, of which I have no idea). inception reckon will win some of the techniques of sound, but as I understand very well what is assessed here, do not add ...
I will venture into the world of streaming from my twitter http://www.twitter.com/gonzansa
please feel invited to discuss their views


here are:


actor in leading role:
Colin Firth - The King's Speech (Franco and Bridges I liked more)
Actor Christian Bale
- The Fighter
actress in leading role
Natalie Portman - Black Swan
Actress
Hailee Steinfeld - True Grit
best animated movie
Toy Story 3
Best Art Direction:
Robert Stromberg, Karen O'Hara - Alice in Wonderland
Best Photography: Jeff
Cronenweth - The Social Network (I also liked Black Swan, but I'm not hot)
Best Costume:
Jenny Beavan - The King's Speech
Best Director:
David Fincher - The Social Network , (we all know well who is missing from this category ...)
best edition:
Angus Wall, Kirk Baxter - The Social Network (same as above ... it is an outrage)
best foreign language film, Biutiful

Best Makeup:
Rick Baker, Dave Elsey - The Wolfman
best music:
Trent Reznor, Atticus Ross - The Social Network (Hans Zimmer to face doggie ...)
best song
original "If I Rise" - 127 Hours
Best Film: The Social Network
(in case you need to clarify ... Inception)
Best Adapted Screenplay:
Aaron Sorkin - The Social Network (True Grit this or leave me happy)
Best Original Screenplay :
Christopher Nolan - Inception

Why Does My Legs Ache Si Ce My Flu

winter's bone (blood ties)


One of the great advantages that American independent cinema has been allowed benefit is the absolute freedom of approach if you contrast it with the structured rules Hollywood. Understood advantage in favor of a more real, less idealized life in the "states". Here there is no commitment to the American dream, the hero of the working class need not succeed, the hard and constant sacrifice does not always reward the idealistic character, spotless, incorruptible not find applause in a corrupt society the small step can not be opened and triumph over the monsters that control everything. At best, and hopefully, you survive.
Ree Dolly (Jennifer Lawrence) is an adult woman with only 17. Take care of her two younger siblings and his mother decided to "disengage" of reality, while attending the house and the family wood business in a rural community in the Ozark Plateau, far from "civilization." When news of his father, known in the region for its link with the production of methamphetamine, bail out using the house and grounds of the family and not to stand trial, the family will lose all you have, Ree is launched to locate and ensure the safety of his family.
In his second film as director, Debra Granik in Winter's Bone paints a scenario extremely cruel. In it, the conviction of his protagonist to act in a decent and honest will get the final results be constantly colliding with the real dynamics of their environment, driven by codes that are stronger than almost naive ideals of the young. The reality seems to be struggling to consume the determination of Ree, as we, the viewers, we descend into a grim spiral that reveals the forgotten corners of the cinema of the American dream and despair grows as the chances of finding the father of the protagonist will peter out.
The story works well almost at an excuse to introduce the sample of the "fauna" of these regions neglected by the billboards, whose only aspiration, as presented to us in one of the opening scenes in the college of Ree, is the military or maternity.
Lawrence's performance Ree gives a firm that does not fail even in the face barriers in their environment, and is perhaps, along with the gradual discovery of the character of Uncle Teardrop (a sublime John Hawkes), the only glimmer of light in a place that has been gaining its darkness because of the election of its inhabitants (palpable on the screen through the dense splendid photography)

3.5/5.0

Thanks for reading, are a wonderful audience
Gonza

Sunday, February 20, 2011

1981 Panther Arctic Cat

radiohead - the king of limbs


first entry does not cinephile's blog (I warned you at first, do not accept complaints)


yesterday was
publicly available online the eighth studio album by radiohead, or at least include the disk material itself when it goes on sale in March in solid form, since apparently the official launch would include more material " extra

as all post OK radiohead album Computer, need to listen more to incorporate the huge amount of details, textures and musical work that contains every track and develop the vision and drive as a whole. These first eight songs of "The King of Limbs" leave a little more direct attack and guitar of former "In Rainbows" confessed child live sound of the band to return to a more electronic sound that goes back sharply in some way the era of "Amnesiac." The guitars are subtly place, winning the final step of the disc between the sequences, samplers and other resources present in every radiohead album, accompanying it is and always will be the most amazing instrument of the band: the voice of Thom Yorke. It is clearly a more difficult album to listen than its predecessor, but trust in the promise of worth. It helps to fully understand the experience, listening with a good pair of headphones.

Of the eight songs of "The King Of Limbs", only two seem a bit below the standard level of the disc (Bloom and Feral). The other is beautiful, the final combo Codex - Give Up The Ghost - Separator is almost certainly one of the most perfect combinations of all that has given us and this band

I leave a link to that the "viche"


4.0/5.0


Thanks for reading, are a wonderful pubic
Gonza

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Clearblue Ovulation Positive Test Result Gallery

The Kids Are Alright (my family)


There is a strange feeling that emerges when you finish viewing this film could verbalized something similar to "what happened here? "(specifically, in the final act). Lisa Cholodenko, who directs and writes The Kids Are Alright has a history of working in television on such shows as Six Feet Under or The L Word . Homosexual is discovered early in his youth, and now lives in a relationship with a singer with whom he has a son, conceived via anonymous sperm donor. Why this emphasis on the details of his private life? For indeed The Kids Are Alright making various elements of the life of the director, and without being an autobiographical film, no doubt claim that is at least fairly personal to the author.

Nic and Jules (Annette Bening and Juliane Moore respectively) are a gay couple with two teenage children, Joni and Laser (if ... Laser), both conceived with sperm from the same donor, one each mother. A few days before going to college, Joni (Mia Wasikowska), responding to the curiosity of her brother, decides to contact the donor, Paul (Mark Ruffalo). The three begin to grow fond of, which leads to opposite reactions to their mothers, while Nic is opposed to the link that really upset her family, Jules agrees to decorate the garden of Paul and ends (from nothing) sleeping with him.

The problem with The Kids Are Alright is that the "statement" in favor of the functionality of a family with two mothers, homosexuals, is built from a base of the head visible resentment toward heterosexual and more specifically, humans. The background to the drama (it is hard to read this film as a comedy) in the eyes of the filmmaker is the inclusion of heterosexual disruptor element of harmony and not the complex relationships that pre-exist in the film the appearance of Ruffalo's character. Given the opportunity to create a film to shorten the distances, Cholodenko seems to use everything in their power to widen, reaching a resolution that is practically impossible to communicate. In their eagerness to turn Paul into the "bad guy", the director leaves it entirely on the final, denying the possibility of closing and ignoring the bond that the audience has established with him. The truth is that all the characters in the film, is perhaps that of Ruffalo with whom he fell in love us, but we must accept in the last ten minutes which is "the villain" and should suffer so, leaving aside the almost two hours earlier, which saw him learning to love their children and seeking to stabilize them at his side. Meanwhile, Jules and Nic, characters that could be even more "reprehensible" to Paul for his actions in the film, are redeemed and exalted by Cholodenko without much explanation or credibility.

If there is anything that saves watching The Kids Are Alright , are the efforts of the protagonists, particularly Wasikowska, to give credibility and depth to these characters over the shortcomings of the script. Ruffalo shines with the little he has the character to work. Moore Bening and do their best with their characters (which still is not enough in the case of Moore, when saving the final pompous speech.)
Just for the value of interpretations is that this movie gets a ...

2.0/5.0

Thanks for reading, are a wonderful audience
Gonza

Monday, February 14, 2011

Replace Brake Shoes 97 Neon

10

this is what closer to a "happy valentine's day" they will see in my blog ...


a group of critics chose the 10 most memorable romances in movie history, I leave the names and the link below:


1. Rick and Ilsa - Casablanca, 1942 (orcors, could only be the first place)
2. Jack and Rose - Titanic, 1997 (now I continue to read on twitter, I'm not ashamed to say)
3. Chow Mo-wan & Mrs. Chan - In the Mood for Love, 2001 (I ctrl + c, ctrl + v to place names)
4. Ennis Del Mar and Jack Twist - Brokeback Mountain, 2005 (I just lost half my followers, I do not care, get over it ... it's an awesome movie)
5. Wall-E and Eve - Wall-E, 2008 (tiernis)
6. George and Mary - It'sa Wonderful Life, 1946 (cry with this movie able)
7. Delvin and Alicia - Notorious, 1946 (because not only lived the master of suspense)
8. Renato and Jane - Summertime, 1955 (one that did not see)
9. Alvy and Annie - Annie Hall, 1977 (Woody is a romantic ...)
10. Jesse and Celine - Before Sunset, 2004 (one that did not see, I have not fond of Ethan Hawke)


http://www.ew.com/ew/gallery/0,, 20465122, 00.html and here

24 cliches that should be removed from the romantic comedies, it's great that ...

http://www.ew.com/ew/gallery/0,, 20464382.00. Html

Thanks for reading, are a wonderful audience
Gonza

Kates Playground Online Streaming

the movie romances fighter (the winner)


We saw the "story of boxer" on countless occasions. Rocky probably (or more likely some of its sequels) is the first name that pops to mind, but is almost certainly a little digging can remember any other movie that falls within the genre "history of the boxer." In fact it is not even necessary that the protagonist be a fighter and the sport of boxing since the fighting in this format generally operates as the analogy of the path through the character. Is a family drama, a story of self acceptance, social criticism or all combined, "the story of boxer" machine runs constantly in Hollywood as the ultimate example of American dream, to achieve the goal against all possibilities.

The story of Micky Ward (Mark Wahlberg) is a "story of boxer" classic in every sense: Micky fight and train under the shadow of his brother Dicky Eklund (Christian Bale), a former boxer who once came down to Sugar Ray Leonard, but fallen into the bad life and addicted to crack. The fights are not good, his mother and sisters still can not see without comparing it with his brother and Micky quit boxing poses. Meet in the middle Charlene (Amy Adams), one of the few people who seem to have some confidence in the value of Micky in itself, restoring the faith and encouraging them to keep fighting.

Even when based on the true story of Micky Ward, The Fighter, David O. Russell seems to show all the cliches of this type of film all elements are familiar, and we have seen before in fiction. So what makes this film a very solid addition to a genre that ran out to the end? The strength of their performances. Each character in The Fighter is staged so that we find it memorable, but above all, absolutely real. No doubt that Bale is the main focus of attention, and no wonder, the Welshman again show its versatility and ability to contain, within the limits of belief, a performance that might escape from the hands of many of their most experienced colleagues. The physical transformation (which no surprise to those that saw The Machinist) is added to a careful study of gestures, movements and tone of a young boxer from Lowell making absolutely magnetic presence on screen. The most interesting interpretation is in any case, the contrast that generates starring Wahlberg. Much more subtle, low profile, Wahlberg are allowed to operate only when the action demands it, to go back again without difficulty. The performance characteristics of the two make a perfect mirror of the relationship between the two brothers, revealing both its tensions as the other's need that exists for both. Accompany with this dynamic strength, the two female characters in the hands of Amy Adams, the pair of Micky and Melissa Leo as her mother, both nominated for an Oscar for best supporting actress.

Russell ( Flirting With Disaster, Three Kings ) The extent of history and its possibilities in the hands of actors that account, replacing the action of boxing, which gives way to family drama as a narrative that moves over the victories or defeats of Ward. The implementation of this plan is kept full, with, for example, a fine job of editing, so the fights are staged by Micky and his family from the audience, and therefore, for us viewers.
Few films since the original Avildsen Rocky (1976) have dared to give priority to the real drama that makes up the "story of boxer" beyond the specific sporting event, and have generally been those that today are paying off. I believe that The Fighter will be the future one

3.5/5.0

Thanks for reading, are a wonderful audience
Gonza

Monday, February 7, 2011

Do I Soak My Chia Pet For 1 Hour Or 24 Hours?

the social network (social network)


"facebook film," or even "facebook." Thus we commonly refer to "The Social Network " when we bring it to a conversation, and it's true: in some ways is a movie about facebook, but say only that it would greatly reduce the scope and amount depth of the issues it raises. In fact, although we are presented in the media that advertise themselves as "the history of facebook, its historical rigor is not so, and even more, is not meant to be. Even when we close with people (almost all) real and concrete events which were the years that gave birth to the popular social network, screenwriter Aaron Sorkin acknowledges that the facts were made available to tell the story (with case) and generate the necessary debate on the topic at hand and not vice versa. Perhaps the most striking example of this is the brilliant opening scene, a conversation that never was with a woman who does not exist in real life is that, with subtlety, out in the first five minutes of its key issues and probably the whole movie also the experience of facebook. The dialogues (exalted) Sorkin succeed at a frenetic pace, the sound, serious, irrelevant, what is true, what does not, the abrupt change of subject ... we are faced with all that information that is expanding every second with little chance to process all (personally, I had to do three times the scene), playing in another medium almost exactly, the Internet experience, or more specifically the network.

David Fincher (Seven , Zodiac ) uses carefully loaded Sorkin script to make a deep reflection on our inability to communicate in a century which, ironically, seem to provide all the tools you need to do so. The character of Mark Zuckerberg, operator of facebook (Jesse Eisenberg in a great performance) is the one who carries the flag of the digital lifestyle, which replaces the imaginary (or not), the real interaction with people. Fincher put into this character to a whole society that has been assumed that, as noted on the final film Napster creator Sean Parker (Justin Timberlake), it is possible to "live" on the Internet, life is indeed digitizable.

The philosophical, sociological, psychological, etc. would mean a movie like this far exceeds the scope of this review, it could even be the subject of study completed university courses and it would be pretentious to reduce it to four paragraphs, but it is relevant, this being a film review, emphasize the proper use and continues to make environmental Fincher to convey the idea, raising the conflict. And there's no doubt, the claim of the principal is strong, even when careful not to fall into the obvious and very direct exposure verbalized the problem (which would be very easy indeed), Fincher starkly exposes the consequences of embracing without much feed through a new way to interact, in which everything, including human beings, is available to me in its entirety to see, absorb, and So, sadly, lack of it in its reality and humanity and you start losing a bit of humanity itself (away from Zuckerberg made himself the most humane thing around him, his love, his friend ...)

Also
forcefulness than the first, the final scene is perhaps a gift from Fincher to us that or not depends on the optimism with which the read: perhaps all is lost, or perhaps to understand that not everything is replaceable not everything can be transformed into ones and zeros, there is hope.

end would be an insult not to mention at least the great performance Andrew Garfield in the role of Eduardo Saverin, friend and partner for Zuckerberg, the hypnotic soundtrack of Trent Reznor (Nine Inch Nails frontman) and the masterful work of cinematographer Jeff Cronenweth, longtime collaborator of Fincher, who makes a movie apparently so far from the usual places of the principal, must be seen as a film by David Fincher.

4.5/5.0

Thanks for reading, are a wonderful audience
Gonza

Friday, February 4, 2011

Bottomless Laura Bush

127 hours (127 hours)




Aron Ralston (James Franco), arrogant, confident but just a bit sympathetic to load a backpack with some food, some water, flashlight, camera and film and some basic equipment climbing. Without telling anyone of his whereabouts is embarking on a ride through the canyons of Utah. After a brief crossover with a pair of adventurers through a crack, Aron wrong steps, a rock star comes loose and falls inside. His right arm is trapped by the stone, leaving him completely immobilized and seriously injured, the provisions are inadequate and the possibility that someone find is zero: Aron knows that, with luck, will survive a few days before the end inevitable.

The story is quite real and was mediated in 2003, just in case anyway, I will not assume that the outcome of it is known, but simply the name we that the resolution of the same will happen in about five days. Director Danny Boyle (Trainspotting , Slumdog Millionaire ) is planning on a more interesting challenge and deeply complicated: to make this experience something mirable "on the screen. The premise seems quite difficult this task: one small location (actually tiny) and a single operator and unable to move, how to make it something interesting to hold the attention for 93 minutes? For 127 Hours the key lies in two key factors: the ability to Boyle to take a story, however simple, and make her more than a stylistic exercise, and the superb performance of Franco.
Boyle works in close collaboration with an incredible James Franco (far from the youth galancito his early films) trying to get involved in their grief. Know its history through flashbacks, hallucinations and visions, while who he really is revealed in their actions as the days pass and hope reduces trapped in the crack. But the director knows that the only way this experiment works is to go a step further than simple affection for the protagonist, we must feel with him, not just follow your emotions, but to search for a more specific identification, we WE ask that we would do in your situation, look at and analyze their decisions as if they were ours, as if our life is at stake. At the most raw, Boyle, who has never had qualms about showing up to the limit of displayable, choose to incorporate sound as a resource to add the effect to the extent that we find it almost impossible to sustain the gaze. The antithesis which we generate the levels at which it shows the striking beauty of nature, but that is at once the "enemy" of the film is accentuated by an extremely careful photography is allowed to be warm and full of beauty, while threatening.

Boyle All resources however, are in the service of a true tour de force James Franco. Few actors can be fed so versatile the weight of a film like this, and even though this man had already begun to show its true potential is in this role in allowing really explore its possibilities. The range of emotions to which we are exposed and is extensive and the risk involved is to "reveal" the action, losing credibility in the necessary character state changes that are occurring at a dizzying pace. Franco takes the challenge and shows that it is up to par, if not above, allowing the necessary connection that need to accompany him in his days the crack

The result of this collaboration is successful and others recommended, away from function only as a narcissistic exaltation of the capacities of both artists, to connect their intentions, challenges us, ask questions. It tells us of our smallness against the immensity of the world, but also demonstrates our power over such pettiness ... Franco's nomination for an Oscar is well deserved, regardless of the result, leave me at least looking forward to your next job.

4.0/5.0

Thanks for reading, are a wonderful audience
Gonza

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Can I Join The Navy With Eczema

Hereafter (past life)


"Director" movie "is an inseparable pair. And generally any binomial "artist" work "involves a very specific fellowship, film director connection of their work can not only make an assessment of the achievements of the first term of the binomial with respect to the second, but also encrypt keys of the film that reflect the presence of its director, that director and not of anyone else. The play then transmitted to the director, not unlike what happens when you read any book, and is in the feedback that we wonder about the author, who wanted do show, how, what he's talking ... who he is.

Clint Eastwood's name is immediately associated to the action hero, the "Man with No Name" in the Leone westerns and Dirty Harry are the first that come to mind in general and we takes a few minutes to remember that in his 55 year career, the last decade in particular shines much more for his work as director and actor. A non-deceiving anyway, Eastwood directed films since 1971, but probably the turning point it passes from one competent manager to a great director is his anti-western, 1992 Unforgiven (The Unforgiven). From then on, Eastwood began to hoist the flag of constant questioning in his films, wondering about their country, its history, its people, their myths (many of whom helped create), and growing reflexively deconstructing conventions in the same (if Walt Kowalski in Gran Torino is Dirty Harry with years of reflection in between, not what the growth). Hereafter we then and that's when we wonder why Clint Eastwood is making a movie about the afterlife? What drives this man to make a film about life after of death?

The film begins with what is probably one of the most shocking scenes shot by Eastwood: A tsunami (not specified, but subsequent data can believe that refers to the tsunami of 2004) devastates the city in journalist found LeLay Marie (Cécile De France). During the wave, Marie loses his life for a few minutes and get a fuzzy vision of the afterlife with men and women faced with a blinding white light. Upon his return, he begins to investigate everything you can find out about it. Marie's story parallel account of George Lonegan (Matt Damon), an ex - American psychic who can provide connections with the afterlife and in London, Marcus, a boy who loses his brother in a tragic accident. Eastwood then take the time needed to narrate the lives of these three characters and confront the questions of his own mortality. Are the usual questions and answers "popular" also appear, particularly satirized the "experts" on the item refers to Marcus. It is in the film image of the beyond, a vision that the director used repeatedly, it is important to stop and contrast the characters failed attempts to make sense of the finite from the body. Eastwood paints a vague, blurry, out of focus beyond seeks to be the analogue of our own knowledge. In the replay of this image is taking a stance against the conflict set: we will not see in this film answers the questions, not the filmmaker's intention to provide the clarity to understand a phenomenon that is incomprehensible to us is great. The three characters, who somehow reach understanding (perhaps more correct to say "knowledge") of the case see themselves alienated, in deep solitude to have discovered something that was not for mortals to discover, the "curse" that referred to Damon, brilliantly captured in the simplicity of the scenes that show him in more an opportunity to observe through a window as people move away from him.

Why then ask all the questions that the film can not answer? Just because Eastwood invited to believe that we do not need, at least not now, and it is unnecessary and even pretentious attempt to reply. It is only when the players understand that it is essential to connect with life, with themselves and with others in this world, that loneliness disappears. With 80 years of age, it is fascinating that Eastwood may arise a conflict of their own mortality, and respond to it with an attitude that shows life for all points of view. The rest will then ...

3.5/5.0

Thanks for reading, are a wonderful audience
Gonza